I'm happy to say that I have been registered to attend and cover CHI's Seventh Annual Immuno-Oncology Summit next week in Boston. Immunotherapy was the subject of a fascinating panel at BIO last month. I am available to cover this meeting.
https://www.immuno-oncologysummit.com/programs
Wednesday, July 31, 2019
Sunday, July 28, 2019
ASCO 2019: ASCO Releases First-Ever Guidelines for Multiple Myeloma
Development comes on the heels of new drugs, increased
overall survival, and revised diagnostic criteria
By John Otrompke
Science
recently achieved a medical milestone, with the publication of ASCO’s first set
of guidelines for the treatment of multiple myeloma on May 10. Four new drugs
have been approved since 2015. However, the disease remains incurable, with a
median survival of slightly more than five years.
Most patients receive at least four
lines of therapy, according to the article, “Treatment of Multiple
Myeloma: ASCO and CCO Joint Clinical Practice Guideline” (Mikhael, J;
Nofisat, I.; Cheung, M; et al). DOI: 10.1200/JCO.18.02096 Journal of Clinical
Oncology 37, no. 14 (May 10 2019) 1228-1263.
“Survival in the last 15 years is
substantially better,” said Dr. Catherine Diefenbach, MD, director of the
clinical lymphoma program at the NYU Langone Perlmutter Cancer Center in New
York City. “A study by Kumar et al. (Blood 2008 111:2516-2520) found a clear
improvement in overall survival for multiple myeloma patients with relapsed disease
after autologous stem cell transplant, with those relapsing 2000 having a median
OS of 23.9, versus 11.9 months for those
who relapsed before 2000,” explained Diefenbach, who is also an ASCO committee
member.
Even with Five Year Survival, Disease Still
Incurable
Therefore, the guidelines place an
emphasis on newer agents; recommendation 5.2, for example, suggests that those
patients ineligible for stem cell transplant should receive, at a minimum, a
novel agent, and a steroid, if possible.
The guidelines are the result of an
analysis of 124 relevant studies.
“The review began in 2005, because
the therapies that proceeded this are not relevant to the therapies in use
today,” said Diefenbach. “For example, daratumumab is an IgG1kappa monoclonal
antibody directed against the antigen CD38 which is highly expressed by
multiple myeloma cells,” she explained.
(Daratumumab was given breakthrough
status by the FDA in 2013, which put it on an expedited approval schedule. It
was also awarded orphan status by the FDA).
Another
new drug is elotuzumab, which received breakthrough status in 2014. “Dartumumab
is approved for both upfront therapy of multiple myeloma and for relapsed
disease in combination with other agents. Elotuzumab is approved for relapsed patients
that have failed one to three lines of therapy in combination with other agents,”
Diefenbach noted.
Diagnostic
Criteria Updated, Especially for Smoldering Myeloma
Along
with the approval of new agents, the
diagnostic criteria were updated by the International Myeloma Working Group
(IMWG) in 2014. (Lancet Oncol. 2014 Nov;15(12):e538-48. doi:
10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70442-5. Epub 2014 Oct 26). “Many patients who would have
previously been defined as having smoldering myeloma will now be more
appropriately defined as active and in need of therapy,” according to the
guidelines published in JCO.
Autologous stem cell transplant for
patients in first remission remains the standard of care, and age and renal
function should not be the sole criteria for determining eligibility, according
to recommendation 1.2.
For those who are ineligible for
transplant, or in first remission, triplet therapies should be considered. (A
triplet is defined as including two novel agents, according to recommendation
7.3). According to recommendation 5.3, a combination of the four agents
daratumumab, bortezomib, melphalan and prednisone can also be considered.
However, continuous therapy should
be offered preferentially to fixed-duration treatment when initiating certain
novel agents, such as an immunomodulatory drug or a proteasome inhibitor,
according to recommendation 5.5.
“Acquired mutations are important
for the progression from monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance
(MGUS) to multiple myeloma, but have less significance for disease progression
in multiple myeloma,” said Diefenbach. (MGUS is also known as smoldering
myeloma). However, “most multiple myeloma patients will relapse and become
resistant to therapy over time,” she added.
Genetic markers for
high-risk disease include cytogenetic abnormalities such as t(4;14),
t(14;16), t(14;20), del17p13.
Several conferences I am already scheduled to cover this fall
Hi, here are several conferences I have already made arrangements to cover this fall.
They include the Heart Failure Society, AACAP, ACS, RSNA, and the American Epilepsy Society.
Is anyone else interested in articles from these meetings? If so, I need charge you no expenses.
Many thanks,
~John
John_Otrompke@yahoo.com
1. Heart Failure Society of America
Sept. 13-16, Philadelphia
https://meeting.hfsa.org/<https://meeting.hfsa.org/>
2. American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
Oct 14-19, Chicago
https://www.aacap.org/AACAP/CME_and_Meetings/Annual_Meeting/66th_Annual_Meeting/66th_AM_Home.aspx<https://www.aacap.org/AACAP/CME_and_Meetings/Annual_Meeting/66th_Annual_Meeting/66th_AM_Home.aspx>
3. American College of Surgeons
Oct 27-31, San Francisco
https://www.facs.org/clincon2019<https://www.facs.org/clincon2019>
4. Radiological Society of North America
Dec 1-6, Chicago
https://www.rsna.org/annual-meeting<https://www.rsna.org/annual-meeting>
5. American Epilepsy Society
Dec. 6-10, Baltimore
https://meeting.aesnet.org/<https://meeting.aesnet.org/>
They include the Heart Failure Society, AACAP, ACS, RSNA, and the American Epilepsy Society.
Is anyone else interested in articles from these meetings? If so, I need charge you no expenses.
Many thanks,
~John
John_Otrompke@yahoo.com
1. Heart Failure Society of America
Sept. 13-16, Philadelphia
https://meeting.hfsa.org/<https://meeting.hfsa.org/>
2. American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
Oct 14-19, Chicago
https://www.aacap.org/AACAP/CME_and_Meetings/Annual_Meeting/66th_Annual_Meeting/66th_AM_Home.aspx<https://www.aacap.org/AACAP/CME_and_Meetings/Annual_Meeting/66th_Annual_Meeting/66th_AM_Home.aspx>
3. American College of Surgeons
Oct 27-31, San Francisco
https://www.facs.org/clincon2019<https://www.facs.org/clincon2019>
4. Radiological Society of North America
Dec 1-6, Chicago
https://www.rsna.org/annual-meeting<https://www.rsna.org/annual-meeting>
5. American Epilepsy Society
Dec. 6-10, Baltimore
https://meeting.aesnet.org/<https://meeting.aesnet.org/>
Pharma DJ published my article on FDA Commissioner Norman Sharpless from this year's BIO conference
My new client, PharmaDJ (based in Shanghai, China) published my article from the annual BIO conference last month, describing a townhall held by the on FDA Commissioner Dr. Norman Sharpless.
US FDA Must Hire New Staff to Fulfill New Obligations and
Review New Technologies
June 12, 2019Thursday, May 23, 2019
Pediatric Phase 1 Dose-Finding Study of Entrectinib Shows Substantial Benefit in Almost Half the Patients
by John Otrompke
A second study in pediatric
oncology discussed at the ASCO presscast also was the source of surprisingly
good news.
STARTRK-NG was designed as a simple
phase I/IB dose-finding study, but objective responses were seen in almost half
of the subjects. The study enrolled 29 patients, aged 4 to 20, with rare
central nervous system tumors, neuroblastoma, or other solid tumors, of whom 28
were evaluable.
Entrectinib, a novel targeted
treatment, was administered for a median of 281 days, and the tumor shrank or
disappeared in 12 patients. The median time to response was 57 days, according
to abstract 10009, “Phase 1/1B trial to assess the activity of entrectinib in
children and adolescents with recurrent or refractory solid tumors including
central nervous system (CNS) tumors” (Robinson, Gajjar, Gauvain, et al).
“The medicine was well-tolerated
and there appears to be no time frame yet studied in which the medicine stops
working or toxicities become limiting,” according to lead author Giles W.
Robinson, MD, a pediatric neuro-oncologist at St. Jude Children's Research
Hospital in Memphis, who was quoted in the ASCO press release.
No responses were observed among patients
lacking the alterations targeted by entrectinib.
Therapies potentially available in the Pediatric MATCH trial, and the mutations they target
• larotrectinib- targeting NTRK
• erdafitinib- targeting FGFR
• tazemetostat- targeting EZH2 and
other SWI/SNF complex genes
• LY3023414- targeting the
PI3K/MTOR pathway
• selumetinib- targeting the MAPK
pathway
• ensartinib- targeting ALK or ROS1
• vemurafenib- targeting BRAF
• olaparib- targeting defects in
DNA damage repair
• palbociclib- targeting cell cycle
genes
• ulixertinib- targeting the MAPK
pathway
Targeted Therapies May Play a Greater Role in Pediatric Oncology
by John Otrompke
A study
attempted to match pediatric cancer patients with genomic treatments has been
more successful than predicted, according to a presentation at the pre-meeting
press cast of the American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO) given on May
15.
At the
outset of the project (the National Cancer Institute-Children’s Oncology Group
Pediatric Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice, or NCI-COG Pediatric MATCH) in
2017, researchers predicted that only 10% of children with refractory cancer would
have a mutation-based match to genomic treatment, according to COG study chair
Will Parsons, MD, PhD, associate professor of pediatrics-oncology at Baylor College
of Medicine in Houston.
But an interim analysis of more
than 400 patients screened has revealed a significantly higher match rate, with
24% of participants eligible to receive treatment with at least one drug,
according to the ASCO press release.
“The last 10 years has been an
incredible time,” said Parsons, who spoke at the presscast, discussing abstract
10011, “Identification of targetable molecular alterations in the NCI -COG
Pediatric MATCH trial” (Parsons, Janeway, Patton, et al).
The median turn-around time was 15
days. But while 24% of enrollees had a match to an eligible treatment, only 10%
(39 patients) had actually enrolled in a Pediatric MATCH treatment trial,
according to the press release.
Children with cancer sometimes have
a better prognosis than adults, yet fewer targeted therapies for cancer are
tested in children than adults. (There are more than 150 U.S. approvals for
targeted therapies in adult cancers). This situation led
ASCO to identify research into precision therapies in pediatric cancers as a
priority.
While the abstract presented at the
presscast discussed the results of the Pediatric MATCH screening trial, there
is also a treatment protocol, Parsons said.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)